Keeping Score - a piece by Mike Lutomski
- By Gareth Byatt
- •
- 11 Dec, 2017
- •
By Mike Lutomski - formerly of NASA (former Risk Manager for the International Space Station)
Scoring and ranking risks is important, after all it’s a decision support tool, or a management tool where it should help inform important decisions on where to spend resources and focus attention, but these steps of analyzing risks is certainly not the point of risk management.
Risk management is an important communication system where you are trying to gain attention to a potential issue. Trying to get more resources and/or communicate this potential future problem with management and your peers.
Say you use a 5x5 risk matrix, where the vertical axis is likelihood, and the horizontal axis is consequence; it’s not important is your risk is a 3x4 or a 4x3 or even a 5x5. If you’ve entered into the risk register, and have the opportunity to present it to management in a coherent manner, you’ve won. You’ve communicated this potential issue, discussed ways to mitigate it, discussed the resources required including the time and money that it will take to avoid this risk from being realized. It’s not important if some risk management guru or even your peers agree with the “score” of the risk, it’s only important if you’ve gotten attention on the risk!

We held very interesting in-person discussions about how my Urban 2.0 framework and system can be used by cities and towns around the world, and also the release of the UNDRR Global Assessment Report, Special Report 2024, which I was delighted to contribute towards.
The municipality of Bordeaux is continuing to pursue some excellent work in urban resilience, which I will be profiling in due course...

Almost half of Small Island Developing States' (SIDS) populations reside in urban areas. Research into urban resilience and urban planning tends to focus on cities in large nations, and only a relatively small amount of specific research on SIDS cities currently exists. However, much of the general urban resilience research is applicable to SIDS, as long as context is considered.
This paper focuses on ways to implement measures that will foster resilient and dynamic cities in SIDS. Ensuring good policy action to build, maintain and continuously improve these cities is key to achieving sustainable development and resilient prosperity as set out in the Outcome Document of the Fourth International Conference for Small Island Developing States (SIDS4).

With growing challenges like climate change, debt burdens, and dwindling resources, they desperately need an actionable, doable, and ambitious roadmap for the next decade. 2024 is an important year for SIDS, with the SIDS4 conferencetaking place in May.
You can access details about the Forum on the Island Innovation website, here.


You can read edition #1 here. This first edition is an introduction to our work, containing a summary of some of the work we are undertaking, links to case studies and interviews with people about different aspects of avoiding disasters.


We held a very interesting in-person round table discussion with citizens about how disasters can be avoided.
The municipality of Bordeaux is pursuing some excellent resilience work, which I will be profiling in due course...

We reviewed approaches being taken to prevent hazards from turning into disasters, including examples and how innovation is helping countries, cities and communities prevent adverse fallouts from hazard events.
You can access the webinar and download all presentations here.


The December 2022 edition, which covers a wide variety of infrastructure-related topics, is available here...